Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1998-04-28 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3544 HB 325 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) am(brf sup maj fld) An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date was read the second time. Senator Pearce moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 3516. Senator Duncan objected. Senator Pearce called the Senate. The call was satisfied. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3545 HB 325 Senator Duncan withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date was adopted and read the second time. Senator Parnell offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 32, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 354,733,600 Insert 352,833,600 Under General Funds: Delete 99,112,700 Insert 97,212,700 Page 32, line 27: Delete General Relief Medical 1,900,000 Page 32, line 27: Insert Catastrophic and Chronic Illness Assistance (AS 47.08) Under Appropriation Items: Insert 1,900,000 Under General Funds: Insert 1,900,000 Senator Parnell moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Duncan objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3546 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Parnell, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Mackie, Pearce, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Senators Duncan, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 32, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 354,733,600 Insert 355,672,300 Under General Funds: Delete 99,112,700 Insert 100,051,400 Page 32, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete 0 Insert 2,838,700 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3547 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. HB 325 Senators Ellis, Adams, Duncan, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 19, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 49,350,800 Insert 50,358,000 Under General Funds: Delete 49,350,800 Insert 50,358,000 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3548 HB 325 Page 20, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 22,265,400 Insert 22,719,800 Page 20, line 4: Under Allocations: Delete 27,085,400 Insert 27,638,200 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Sharp objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. Senators Ellis, Adams, Duncan, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 4 : Page 16, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete 7,059,900 Insert 7,618,900 Page 16, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete 8,684,500 Insert 9,305,400 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3549 HB 325 Page 21, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 18,966,100 Insert 22,236,700 Page 21, line 18: Under Allocations: Delete 5,878,400 Insert 6,728,400 Page 24, line 6: Under Allocations: Delete 728,100 Insert 835,200 Page 25, line 21: Under Allocations: Delete 27,326,400 Insert 27,411,400 Page 34, line 4: Under General Funds: Delete 7,578,600 Insert 8,378,600 Page 39, line 7: Under Allocations: Delete 1,195,200 Insert 2,580,000 Page 39, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete 8,164,200 Insert 8,414,200 Page 43, line 3: Under Allocations: Delete 2,385,600 Insert 3,665,600 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3550 HB 325 Page 50, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 33,193,800 Insert 34,712,600 Page 50, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete 5,029,000 Insert 5,965,000 Page 51, line 24: Under Allocations: Delete 1,749,000 Insert 1,930,200 Page 51, line 32: Under General Funds: Delete 1,975,300 Insert 2,327,100 Adjust each Department appropriation accordingly. Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Mackie objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 4 failed. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3551 HB 325 Senators Duncan, Adams, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 5 : Page 7, line 13: after Funding: Insert for salary and benefit adjustments for University of Alaska employees who are not members of a collective bargaining unit and Page 56, line 31: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 442,214,500 Insert 443,795,100 Under General Funds: Delete 166,106,800 Insert 167,687,400 Page 56, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete -4,453,200 Insert -2,872,600 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. Senator Ward offered Amendment No. 6 : 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3552 HB 325 Page 23, Line 9: Delete the DOC Valdez Therapeutic Community programs Insert a therapeutic community program Senator Ward moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Lincoln objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 6 was adopted. Senator Halford offered Amendment No. 7 : Page 3, line 25, following appropriations: Insert , up to $700,000,000, Senator Halford moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3553 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 7 was adopted. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 29, line 28: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 773,400 Insert 966,500 Under General Funds: Delete 473,200 Insert 473,323.1 Under Other Funds: Delete 300,200 Insert 300,270 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3554 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 9 : Page 30, line 10: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,283,900 Insert 1,476,300 Under General Funds: Delete 796,800 Insert 989,200 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3555 HB 325 Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 10 : Page 30, line 11: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 11,511,500 Insert 11,811,500 Under General Funds: Delete 1,676,200 Insert 1,851,200 Under Other Funds: Delete 9,835,300 Insert 9,960,300 Page 30, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete 2,270,700 Insert 2,570,700 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 11 : 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3556 HB 325 Page 28, line 24: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 41,708,900 Insert 41,868,500 Under General Funds: Delete 25,651,600 Insert 25,811,200 Page 28, line 33: Under Allocations: Delete 4,032,500 Insert 4,192,100 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11. Senator Mackie objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senator Green offered Amendment No. 12 : Page 18, line 9 after Anchorage: Insert, two satellite offices in Mat-Su, and one satellite office in North Pole Senator Green moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Senator Duncan objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, Amendment No. 12 was adopted. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3557 HB 325 Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 13 : Page 18, line 23: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,531,200 Insert 1,610,800 Under General Funds: Delete 1,039,400 Insert 1,119,000 Page 18, line 25: Under Allocations: Delete 370,900 Insert 450,500 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 13 failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 14 : 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3558 HB 325 Page 18, line 27: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,399,100 Insert 5,649,100 Under General Funds: Delete 4,265,300 Insert 4,515,300 Page 18, line 28: Under Allocations: Delete 3,019,100 Insert 3,269,100 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 19, line 26: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,948,000 Insert 6,032,100 Under General Funds: Delete 1,955,600 Insert 2,039,700 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3559 HB 325 Page 19, line 27: Under Allocations: Delete 453,000 Insert 537,100 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Mackie objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 16 : Page 44, line 19: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 4,594,100 Insert 4,781,100 Under General Funds: Delete 1,920,200 Insert 2,107,200 Page 44, line 20: Under Allocations: Delete 385,400 Insert 572,400 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 16. Senator Taylor objected. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3560 HB 325 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 16 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 17 : Page 51, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 10,777,300 Insert 10,893,300 Under General Funds: Delete 8,037,100 Insert 8,153,100 Page 51, line 26: Under Allocations: Delete 2,689,700 Insert 2,805,700 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 17. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3561 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 17 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 18 : Page 48, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,816,700 Insert 16,128,700 Under General Funds: Delete 14,550,700 Insert 14,862,700 Page 48, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 11,016,600 Insert 11,328,600 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 18. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3562 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 18 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 19 : Page 25, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 731,170,700 Insert 751,370,700 Under General Funds: Delete 677,261,000 Insert 697,461,000 Page 25, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete 660,931,300 Insert 681,131,300 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 19. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3563 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 19 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 20 : Page 26, line 32: Under Allocations: Delete 8,917,100 Insert 9,157,100 Under General Funds: Delete 1,366,400 Insert 1,606,400 Page 27, line 8: Under Allocations: Delete 1,110,400 Insert 1,350,400 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 20. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3564 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 20 failed. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 21 : Page 51, line 32: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 15,813,500 Insert 16,848,100 Under General Funds: Delete 1,975,300 Insert 2,327,100 Under Other Funds: Delete 13,838,200 Insert 14,521,000 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 21. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3565 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 21 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 22 : Page 38, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 68,586,100 Insert 68,836,100 Under General Funds: Delete 22,281,400 Insert 22,531,400 Page 39, line 10: Under Allocations: Delete 8,164,200 Insert 8,414,200 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 22. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 22 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3566 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 22 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 22 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 23 : Page 51, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 10,777,300 Insert 11,015,900 Under General Funds: Delete 8,037,100 Insert 8,295,700 Page 51, line 23: Under Allocations: Delete 2,003,600 Insert 2,242,200 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 23. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 23 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3567 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 23 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 23 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 24 : Page 50, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 6,999,000 Insert 7,507,200 Under General Funds: Delete 6,999,000 Insert 7,507,200 Page 50, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete 5,029,000 Insert 5,537,200 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 24. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3568 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 24 failed. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 25 : Page 11, line 26: Delete School fund (AS 43.50.140) Insert General Fund Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 25. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 25 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 25 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 25 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 26 : 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3569 HB 325 Page 24, line 18: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,988,200 Insert 2,145,200 Under General Funds: Delete 1,988,200 Insert 2,145,200 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 26. Senator Green objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 26 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 26 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 26 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 27 : Page 38, line 33: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 68,586,100 Insert 69,036,100 Under General Funds: Delete 22,281,400 Insert 22,731,400 Page 39, line 15: Under Allocations: Delete 1,596,100 Insert 2,046,100 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3570 HB 325 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 27. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 27 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 27 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 27 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 28 : Page 41, line 13: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 5,288,400 Insert 5,338,400 Under General Funds: Delete 2,588,700 Insert 2,638,700 Page 41, line 21: Insert COMPASS Community Grants Under General Funds: Insert 50,000 Renumber accordingly Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 28. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 28 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3571 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 28 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 28 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 29 : Page 50, line 12: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 6,999,000 Insert 7,219,000 Under General Funds: Delete 6,999,000 Insert 7,219,000 Page 50, line 14: Under Allocations: Delete 5,029,000 Insert 5,249,000 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 29. Senator Torgerson objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 29 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3572 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 29 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 29 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 30 : Page 22, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 115,958,300 Insert 116,265,800 Under General Funds: Delete 108,670,600 Insert 108,978,100 Page 22, line 17: Under Allocations: Delete 11,444,400 Insert 11,751,900 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 30. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 30 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3573 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 30 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 30 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 31 : Page 32, line 29: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 65,426,800 Insert 65,666,800 Under Other Funds: Delete 39,705,800 Insert 39,945,800 Page 32, line 33: Component: Public Assistance Field Services Under Other Funds: Insert 240,000 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 31. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 31 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3574 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 31 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 31 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 32 : Page 22, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 115,958,300 Insert 116,459,700 Under General Funds: Delete 108,670,600 Insert 109,172,000 Page 24, line 5: Under Allocations: Delete 4,800,000 Insert 5,301,400 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 32. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 32 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3575 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 32 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 32 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 33 : Page 25, line 9: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 731,170,700 Insert 734,475,100 Under General Funds: Delete 677,261,000 Insert 680,565,400 Add a new line after line 10, Additional District Support Under Allocations: Insert 3,304,400 Renumber following sections accordingly Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 33. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 33 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3576 HB 325 SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 33 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken and so, Amendment No. 33 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 34 : Page 18, line 16: Under Appropriation Items: Delete 1,647,800 Insert 1,662,800 Under General Funds: Delete 1,639,700 Insert 1,654,700 Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 34. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3577 HB 325 Pearce changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Taylor changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Leman changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Kelly changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Donley changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 34 failed. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) am S was read the third time. Senator Pearce moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objections were heard and Senator Pearce was required to vote. The question being: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) am S An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government, for certain programs, and to capitalize funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 325(FIN) am S passed the Senate. 1998-04-28 Senate Journal Page 3578 HB 325 Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Taylor moved that the budget reserve fund be adopted (Sec. 7 and page 52, lines 16 - 24). The question being: Shall the budget reserve fund be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 325(FIN) am S Budget Reserve Fund YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln and so, the budget reserve fund was adopted and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.